Since they provided emergency transportation, and even though there was evidence that they told the girlfriend “to say that she had fallen down,” they were not liable as a matter of law. (Youngblood v. Schireman)
The Rescue Doctrine
The Rescue Doctrine is the flip-side of immunity for Good Samaritans. This doctrine allows a Good Samaritan (here called a rescuer) to recover damages from a person rescued if the rescued person negligently caused a dangerous situation that invited the rescue. The idea behind this doctrine is that “danger invites rescue.”
The Washington Supreme Court used the Rescue Doctrine to allow a man to sue an SUV manufacturer after he stopped to help a driver whose SUV had rolled over.
After assisting the driver, as he walked on the shoulder with a lit flare, the rescuer was struck from behind by a hit and run vehicle.
The Court held that the manufacturer could be liable if a jury determined that it was foreseeable that a defective SUV could roll and that a rescuer could be injured. (McCoy v. Suzuki)
Summary
Under the Rescue Doctrine, if a drunk driver crashes and you stop to help and are injured in the process, you have a claim against the drunk.
In this same situation, with Good Samaritan rule, so long as you aren’t drunk or getting paid, if you try to help and negligently injure the drunk, you would most likely have a complete defense against a lawsuit by the drunk.
So go ahead, be a Good Samaritan— show mercy and help someone in need.
Seattle personal injury lawyer Bob Anderton represents bicyclists, pedestrians,
and drivers who have been injured in collisions. He occasionally
represents people who have been injured in unsafe places
or those whose insurance companies have acted in bad faith.
He is also a court-appointed settlement guardian ad litem.
Bob can be reached at (206) 262-9290 or bob@andertonlaw.com.